<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 966 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405638</link>
    <description>An alternative statutory remedy does not create an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, and the High Court may intervene where exceptional circumstances exist, including unfairness, perversity, lack of jurisdiction, or violation of natural justice. Where a writ petition has remained pending for years and connected matters raise the same controversy, restoration for decision on merits may be appropriate instead of termination at the threshold on maintainability. The writ appeal was allowed, the dismissal order was set aside, the writ petition was restored for hearing with connected petitions, and the interim stay on the order-in-original was continued until disposal of the connected writ matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 966 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405638</link>
      <description>An alternative statutory remedy does not create an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, and the High Court may intervene where exceptional circumstances exist, including unfairness, perversity, lack of jurisdiction, or violation of natural justice. Where a writ petition has remained pending for years and connected matters raise the same controversy, restoration for decision on merits may be appropriate instead of termination at the threshold on maintainability. The writ appeal was allowed, the dismissal order was set aside, the writ petition was restored for hearing with connected petitions, and the interim stay on the order-in-original was continued until disposal of the connected writ matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>