<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 964 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405636</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ appeal, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration on the issue of limitation alone. The respondent was directed to complete this exercise within 12 weeks, ensuring an opportunity for a personal hearing to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:10:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 964 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405636</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ appeal, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration on the issue of limitation alone. The respondent was directed to complete this exercise within 12 weeks, ensuring an opportunity for a personal hearing to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>