<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1742 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294151</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that there was no negligence on the part of the assessee in providing relevant details for assessment. The decision to reopen the assessment after four years and change the basis of disallowance under Section 14A was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeal, resulting in the deletion of the disallowance by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1742 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294151</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that there was no negligence on the part of the assessee in providing relevant details for assessment. The decision to reopen the assessment after four years and change the basis of disallowance under Section 14A was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeal, resulting in the deletion of the disallowance by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>