<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1664 - ITAT BANGALORE </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294155</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, remanding key issues to the TPO for further evaluation. It directed the exclusion of certain comparables due to functional dissimilarities and remanded others for reassessment. The Tribunal emphasized accurate comparability analysis and proper handling of interest on receivables, aligning with established judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1664 - ITAT BANGALORE </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294155</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, remanding key issues to the TPO for further evaluation. It directed the exclusion of certain comparables due to functional dissimilarities and remanded others for reassessment. The Tribunal emphasized accurate comparability analysis and proper handling of interest on receivables, aligning with established judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>