https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405611 Service of a section 8 demand notice at the corporate debtor's registered office as reflected in MCA master data satisfied the prescribed mode of service, and the identity of the person who physically received it was immaterial. The operational debt was held to be within limitation because the transaction was treated as a running account and the relevant default date fell within three years of filing. No pre-existing dispute was found, as a valid dispute must be real, plausible, and supported by material rather than bare denial or unrelated allegations. The section 9 admission order was therefore upheld. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:07:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405611 Service of a section 8 demand notice at the corporate debtor's registered office as reflected in MCA master data satisfied the prescribed mode of service, and the identity of the person who physically received it was immaterial. The operational debt was held to be within limitation because the transaction was treated as a running account and the relevant default date fell within three years of filing. No pre-existing dispute was found, as a valid dispute must be real, plausible, and supported by material rather than bare denial or unrelated allegations. The section 9 admission order was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405611