<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 927 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order, denying exemption under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act and treating the gain as long-term capital gain. The Tribunal remitted the issue to the Assessing Officer for further consideration, instructing the assessee to provide additional evidence to support the claim of share purchase in 1999-2000. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment based on the Tribunal&#039;s guidance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 927 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order, denying exemption under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act and treating the gain as long-term capital gain. The Tribunal remitted the issue to the Assessing Officer for further consideration, instructing the assessee to provide additional evidence to support the claim of share purchase in 1999-2000. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment based on the Tribunal&#039;s guidance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>