<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 924 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of the disallowed deduction based on the debit note issued by the supplier. The Tribunal found the expenditure valid, as it pertained to the previous financial year and was in accordance with the agreement, endorsing the CIT(A)&#039;s rationale and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 924 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of the disallowed deduction based on the debit note issued by the supplier. The Tribunal found the expenditure valid, as it pertained to the previous financial year and was in accordance with the agreement, endorsing the CIT(A)&#039;s rationale and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>