<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1383 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294123</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the assessee must meet the burden of proof under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for international transactions. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, and the case was remanded to the AO for reevaluation, considering additional evidence. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the AO to make a decision in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1383 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294123</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the assessee must meet the burden of proof under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for international transactions. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, and the case was remanded to the AO for reevaluation, considering additional evidence. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the AO to make a decision in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>