<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1477 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the annual letting value (ALV) of the vacant flat as per the Municipal Ratable Value (MRV), in accordance with previous decisions involving the same assessee and family members. The Tribunal rejected the method of increasing the MRV by 5% annually for determining ALV, emphasizing the need for consistency in ALV determination based on MRV.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:20:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1477 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the annual letting value (ALV) of the vacant flat as per the Municipal Ratable Value (MRV), in accordance with previous decisions involving the same assessee and family members. The Tribunal rejected the method of increasing the MRV by 5% annually for determining ALV, emphasizing the need for consistency in ALV determination based on MRV.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>