<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 881 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294138</link>
    <description>Mandatory compliance with SARFAESI possession, sale notice, sale confirmation and payment timelines was treated as essential, and the secured creditor&#039;s failure to prove proper service, affixture, publication and timely confirmation rendered the possession proceedings and sale invalid. The Court also held that the writ was maintainable because the statutory appeal was not an efficacious remedy in the circumstances. The borrowers&#039; challenge was not barred by limitation and no waiver arose, as the creditor had not disclosed the auction result before the challenge and the borrowers promptly objected to subsequent steps. Sale of the entire secured asset for dues far below the reserve value was additionally found not bona fide, and the enforcement measures were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:20:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 881 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294138</link>
      <description>Mandatory compliance with SARFAESI possession, sale notice, sale confirmation and payment timelines was treated as essential, and the secured creditor&#039;s failure to prove proper service, affixture, publication and timely confirmation rendered the possession proceedings and sale invalid. The Court also held that the writ was maintainable because the statutory appeal was not an efficacious remedy in the circumstances. The borrowers&#039; challenge was not barred by limitation and no waiver arose, as the creditor had not disclosed the auction result before the challenge and the borrowers promptly objected to subsequent steps. Sale of the entire secured asset for dues far below the reserve value was additionally found not bona fide, and the enforcement measures were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>