<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 909 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405581</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening the assessment for the year 2011-2012. The court found discrepancies in the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer, lack of proper application of mind, and inadequacy of evidence supporting the reopening. The court concluded that the notice was based on assumptions and lacked proper evidence, ultimately setting it aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 909 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405581</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening the assessment for the year 2011-2012. The court found discrepancies in the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer, lack of proper application of mind, and inadequacy of evidence supporting the reopening. The court concluded that the notice was based on assumptions and lacked proper evidence, ultimately setting it aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>