<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 20 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24962</link>
    <description>The court held that the surplus realized on the sale of goodwill, which was purchased and had a determinable cost, is assessable as capital gains under section 45. Additionally, the court ruled that the assessee is not entitled to depreciation on immovable property not transferred by a registered deed of conveyance. The judgment was directed to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, with each party bearing their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:02:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 20 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24962</link>
      <description>The court held that the surplus realized on the sale of goodwill, which was purchased and had a determinable cost, is assessable as capital gains under section 45. Additionally, the court ruled that the assessee is not entitled to depreciation on immovable property not transferred by a registered deed of conveyance. The judgment was directed to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, with each party bearing their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>