<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 903 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405575</link>
    <description>Party autonomy under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits adoption of institutional rules providing for emergency relief, so an emergency arbitrator appointed under SIAC Rules can function as an arbitral tribunal for urgent interim measures and the resulting order is enforceable under Section 17(2). The group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory affiliate where the agreements, negotiations, performance, and conduct show a composite transaction and a clear common intention to arbitrate together. A challenge that the emergency order was void for alleged FEMA or control violations was treated as a merits objection, not a jurisdictional nullity, and the order was sustained and enforced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 903 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405575</link>
      <description>Party autonomy under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits adoption of institutional rules providing for emergency relief, so an emergency arbitrator appointed under SIAC Rules can function as an arbitral tribunal for urgent interim measures and the resulting order is enforceable under Section 17(2). The group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory affiliate where the agreements, negotiations, performance, and conduct show a composite transaction and a clear common intention to arbitrate together. A challenge that the emergency order was void for alleged FEMA or control violations was treated as a merits objection, not a jurisdictional nullity, and the order was sustained and enforced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>