https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405565 The court upheld the order allowing the respondent to travel abroad, subject to conditions such as surrendering the passport upon return and not seeking extensions. Concerns raised by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence regarding the respondent's return under the Extradition Treaty between India and Korea were dismissed. The court directed the DRI to accompany the respondent for visa renewal, considering the circumstances, including the seized gold and the respondent's family situation. The court found no flaw in the impugned order, emphasizing compliance with the conditions and the interest of justice, ultimately affirming the respondent's travel abroad. en-us Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:42:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405565 The court upheld the order allowing the respondent to travel abroad, subject to conditions such as surrendering the passport upon return and not seeking extensions. Concerns raised by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence regarding the respondent's return under the Extradition Treaty between India and Korea were dismissed. The court directed the DRI to accompany the respondent for visa renewal, considering the circumstances, including the seized gold and the respondent's family situation. The court found no flaw in the impugned order, emphasizing compliance with the conditions and the interest of justice, ultimately affirming the respondent's travel abroad. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405565