<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 875 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405547</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, deleting additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for share capital, share premium, and unsecured loans, except for ARG Auto Components Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal found the assessee provided ample evidence to prove the transactions&#039; legitimacy. The CIT(A) correctly admitted additional evidence under Rule 46A, following due process. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 875 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405547</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, deleting additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for share capital, share premium, and unsecured loans, except for ARG Auto Components Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal found the assessee provided ample evidence to prove the transactions&#039; legitimacy. The CIT(A) correctly admitted additional evidence under Rule 46A, following due process. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>