https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405515 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the NIT open tender process for the State Level Centralized Call Centre/Dial-100 Project Phase-II. The petitioner alleged arbitrary actions and malafide intent by the respondents. However, the HC found no merit in these claims, emphasizing that the petitioner had a fair opportunity to participate but failed to do so timely. The HC upheld the validity of the tender process and the selection of the winning bid, concluding that the respondents did not act arbitrarily. The petitioner's non-participation weakened their case, leading to the dismissal of their request to quash the tender process. en-us Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405515 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the NIT open tender process for the State Level Centralized Call Centre/Dial-100 Project Phase-II. The petitioner alleged arbitrary actions and malafide intent by the respondents. However, the HC found no merit in these claims, emphasizing that the petitioner had a fair opportunity to participate but failed to do so timely. The HC upheld the validity of the tender process and the selection of the winning bid, concluding that the respondents did not act arbitrarily. The petitioner's non-participation weakened their case, leading to the dismissal of their request to quash the tender process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405515