https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405509 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the directions issued by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), emphasizing the availability of statutory remedies under the Income Tax Act. The court found that the DRP had considered the petitioner's objections, including the rule of consistency, and concluded that there was no breach of natural justice. It reiterated that writ petitions are generally not entertained when alternate remedies exist, and the appropriate forum for evaluating the case's merits is the Assessing Officer and appellate authorities. The court held that the petitioner could raise all arguments before the relevant forum when the directions under Section 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act are finalized. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jul 2021 15:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405509 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the directions issued by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), emphasizing the availability of statutory remedies under the Income Tax Act. The court found that the DRP had considered the petitioner's objections, including the rule of consistency, and concluded that there was no breach of natural justice. It reiterated that writ petitions are generally not entertained when alternate remedies exist, and the appropriate forum for evaluating the case's merits is the Assessing Officer and appellate authorities. The court held that the petitioner could raise all arguments before the relevant forum when the directions under Section 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act are finalized. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405509