<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 835 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405507</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order due to errors in disallowing interest expenditure, confusion over non-compliance allegations, adjudication of unrelated grounds, and a mistake in the appellant&#039;s name. The Tribunal directed a fresh hearing to rectify these issues, emphasizing the significance of procedural accuracy and fair tax adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:17:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 835 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405507</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order due to errors in disallowing interest expenditure, confusion over non-compliance allegations, adjudication of unrelated grounds, and a mistake in the appellant&#039;s name. The Tribunal directed a fresh hearing to rectify these issues, emphasizing the significance of procedural accuracy and fair tax adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>