<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 818 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405490</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order upholding the addition on alleged non-genuine purchases. Relying on a Bombay High Court judgment, the tribunal directed the AO to restrict additions to align with the gross profit rate on genuine purchases, emphasizing the importance of consistency in gross profit rates and considering both purchases and sales in such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2021 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 818 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405490</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order upholding the addition on alleged non-genuine purchases. Relying on a Bombay High Court judgment, the tribunal directed the AO to restrict additions to align with the gross profit rate on genuine purchases, emphasizing the importance of consistency in gross profit rates and considering both purchases and sales in such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>