<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 674 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294120</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 50% of the interest claimed on working capital loan due to lack of evidence proving it was wholly for business purposes. Similarly, 50% of bank charges were disallowed for the same reason. The Tribunal emphasized the need to prove expenses were exclusively for business to claim deductions under the Income Tax Act, dismissing revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing assessee&#039;s Cross Objections for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:15:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 674 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294120</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of 50% of the interest claimed on working capital loan due to lack of evidence proving it was wholly for business purposes. Similarly, 50% of bank charges were disallowed for the same reason. The Tribunal emphasized the need to prove expenses were exclusively for business to claim deductions under the Income Tax Act, dismissing revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing assessee&#039;s Cross Objections for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>