<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 36 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24947</link>
    <description>An order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act refusing interest on a refund was treated as an order reducing the refund because the denial of interest diminished the amount actually refundable to the assessee. On that footing, the rectification order fell within the appellate scope of section 246(1)(f) and was therefore appealable. The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:18:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 36 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24947</link>
      <description>An order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act refusing interest on a refund was treated as an order reducing the refund because the denial of interest diminished the amount actually refundable to the assessee. On that footing, the rectification order fell within the appellate scope of section 246(1)(f) and was therefore appealable. The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>