<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 944 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294113</link>
    <description>Tender conditions for High Security Registration Plates are not immutable; a State may revise them when material circumstances change, including failed tender progress, increased competition, and a larger pool of approved manufacturers. The earlier Supreme Court decision upheld the conditions on the facts then existing, but it did not require identical terms in every future tender. Because the policy change aimed to broaden competition while preserving technical standards and public safety, and no arbitrariness, mala fides, discrimination, or statutory breach was shown, the deletion of the foreign-experience and turnover requirements was valid and not open to interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 944 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294113</link>
      <description>Tender conditions for High Security Registration Plates are not immutable; a State may revise them when material circumstances change, including failed tender progress, increased competition, and a larger pool of approved manufacturers. The earlier Supreme Court decision upheld the conditions on the facts then existing, but it did not require identical terms in every future tender. Because the policy change aimed to broaden competition while preserving technical standards and public safety, and no arbitrariness, mala fides, discrimination, or statutory breach was shown, the deletion of the foreign-experience and turnover requirements was valid and not open to interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>