<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 25 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24942</link>
    <description>For reference under section 256, only questions that genuinely arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order are referable to the High Court. The questions challenging rejection of the assessee&#039;s book results and the Tribunal&#039;s estimation of income were treated as part of the same controversy and held referable, so the Tribunal was directed to state the case on those points. Questions treated as a further aspect of that controversy were not separately referable, and a challenge directed at the Commissioner (Appeals) was held barred because that order had merged in the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The petition therefore succeeded only in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:05:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 25 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24942</link>
      <description>For reference under section 256, only questions that genuinely arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order are referable to the High Court. The questions challenging rejection of the assessee&#039;s book results and the Tribunal&#039;s estimation of income were treated as part of the same controversy and held referable, so the Tribunal was directed to state the case on those points. Questions treated as a further aspect of that controversy were not separately referable, and a challenge directed at the Commissioner (Appeals) was held barred because that order had merged in the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The petition therefore succeeded only in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>