<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 790 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal resolved the dispute over the interest rate on a delayed refund in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods. The appellant was initially granted a refund with interest at 6% by the adjudicating authority. However, citing precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Jurisdictional High Court, the Tribunal determined the appellant was entitled to interest at 12% per annum, effective three months after the Tribunal&#039;s order until the refund was issued. This decision aligns with established legal principles and provides a precedent for similar excise duty cases, ensuring consistency in the application of interest rates on delayed refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 790 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal resolved the dispute over the interest rate on a delayed refund in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods. The appellant was initially granted a refund with interest at 6% by the adjudicating authority. However, citing precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Jurisdictional High Court, the Tribunal determined the appellant was entitled to interest at 12% per annum, effective three months after the Tribunal&#039;s order until the refund was issued. This decision aligns with established legal principles and provides a precedent for similar excise duty cases, ensuring consistency in the application of interest rates on delayed refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>