https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405450 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside all demands under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It determined that services provided in Jammu & Kashmir were taxable, not exempted, and accepted the appellant's C.A. certificate as valid evidence of service tax payment. The Tribunal also found that the appellant had appropriately reversed cenvat credit on cleared inputs, as evidenced by submitted invoices and a C.A. certificate. Consequently, the demands totaling Rs. 180,242 were dismissed, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405450 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside all demands under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It determined that services provided in Jammu & Kashmir were taxable, not exempted, and accepted the appellant's C.A. certificate as valid evidence of service tax payment. The Tribunal also found that the appellant had appropriately reversed cenvat credit on cleared inputs, as evidenced by submitted invoices and a C.A. certificate. Consequently, the demands totaling Rs. 180,242 were dismissed, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405450