<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 768 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim, ruling it as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s failure to protest the reversal of the amount and the delayed filing of the claim led to the application of Section 11B. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of timely actions and adherence to procedural requirements, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 768 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim, ruling it as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s failure to protest the reversal of the amount and the delayed filing of the claim led to the application of Section 11B. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of timely actions and adherence to procedural requirements, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>