<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 761 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405433</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decision of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was ruled that penalties are not applicable when income adjustments are made on an estimation basis without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming that the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 761 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405433</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decision of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was ruled that penalties are not applicable when income adjustments are made on an estimation basis without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming that the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>