<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 760 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405432</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai acknowledged errors in its order for the assessment year 2013-14, where it disallowed commission payments and failed to address an unadjudicated ground raised by the applicant. The tribunal recognized the mistake in overlooking evidence submitted by the applicant regarding the commission payments and failing to adjudicate on certain expenses. Consequently, the tribunal recalled its order and directed further proceedings to consider the applicant&#039;s claims fairly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 760 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405432</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai acknowledged errors in its order for the assessment year 2013-14, where it disallowed commission payments and failed to address an unadjudicated ground raised by the applicant. The tribunal recognized the mistake in overlooking evidence submitted by the applicant regarding the commission payments and failing to adjudicate on certain expenses. Consequently, the tribunal recalled its order and directed further proceedings to consider the applicant&#039;s claims fairly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>