<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 754 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405426</link>
    <description>The application was dismissed as premature and lacking merit. The Committee of Creditors&#039; approval of respondent No. 3&#039;s resolution plan was upheld, affirming the commercial wisdom of the CoC. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was found to have adhered to the required regulations and objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:45:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 754 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405426</link>
      <description>The application was dismissed as premature and lacking merit. The Committee of Creditors&#039; approval of respondent No. 3&#039;s resolution plan was upheld, affirming the commercial wisdom of the CoC. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was found to have adhered to the required regulations and objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>