<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1170 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294109</link>
    <description>The SEBI issued an Ad-Interim Ex-Parte Order in a case involving insider trading activities in shares of a company. The investigation revealed that insiders traded shares while in possession of unpublished price sensitive information, violating regulations. The order impounded the unlawful notional loss avoided by the insiders and directed freezing of their bank and demat accounts. The individuals were prohibited from disposing of assets until the impounded amounts were credited to an Escrow Account. They were required to provide an asset inventory and show cause why further directions, including disgorgement and market access prohibition, should not be issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1170 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294109</link>
      <description>The SEBI issued an Ad-Interim Ex-Parte Order in a case involving insider trading activities in shares of a company. The investigation revealed that insiders traded shares while in possession of unpublished price sensitive information, violating regulations. The order impounded the unlawful notional loss avoided by the insiders and directed freezing of their bank and demat accounts. The individuals were prohibited from disposing of assets until the impounded amounts were credited to an Escrow Account. They were required to provide an asset inventory and show cause why further directions, including disgorgement and market access prohibition, should not be issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>