https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294110 The Tribunal quashed the ex-parte order directing deposit in an Escrow Account, citing lack of extreme urgency and violation of natural justice principles. It emphasized evidence-based decisions, post-decisional hearings, and urgency criteria for interim orders. The appellant was directed to respond to the show cause notice, with restrictions on shareholdings imposed for investor protection. The Tribunal stressed the importance of balancing regulatory powers with procedural fairness and evidence-based decision-making in securities market cases. en-us Sat, 27 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:45:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294110 The Tribunal quashed the ex-parte order directing deposit in an Escrow Account, citing lack of extreme urgency and violation of natural justice principles. It emphasized evidence-based decisions, post-decisional hearings, and urgency criteria for interim orders. The appellant was directed to respond to the show cause notice, with restrictions on shareholdings imposed for investor protection. The Tribunal stressed the importance of balancing regulatory powers with procedural fairness and evidence-based decision-making in securities market cases. Case-Laws SEBI Sat, 27 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294110