https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294100 Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is confined to an error apparent or other narrow recognised grounds, and cannot be used to re-open the merits, re-argue the case, or obtain an appellate reappraisal of the earlier order. Mere liberty to seek review after withdrawal of a special leave petition did not confer any substantive right to alteration of the prior decision. The earlier reference to arbitration had been made within the limited scope of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the relief sought in review was beyond that permissible ambit. No direction could therefore be granted in review concerning the earlier arbitration reference or the disclosure requirement under Section 12(5). en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:44:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294100 Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is confined to an error apparent or other narrow recognised grounds, and cannot be used to re-open the merits, re-argue the case, or obtain an appellate reappraisal of the earlier order. Mere liberty to seek review after withdrawal of a special leave petition did not confer any substantive right to alteration of the prior decision. The earlier reference to arbitration had been made within the limited scope of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the relief sought in review was beyond that permissible ambit. No direction could therefore be granted in review concerning the earlier arbitration reference or the disclosure requirement under Section 12(5). Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294100