https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294087 A decree for possession became enforceable on pronouncement, while the separate enquiry into mesne profits under Order XX Rule 12(1) CPC did not make it a composite decree or postpone execution of the possession decree. Limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 ran from enforceability, and a dismissed review did not attract merger so as to suspend that period. In the absence of an express stay operating against the possession decree, the execution petition was barred by limitation. The SC set aside the judgment below and held the execution petition time-barred. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294087 A decree for possession became enforceable on pronouncement, while the separate enquiry into mesne profits under Order XX Rule 12(1) CPC did not make it a composite decree or postpone execution of the possession decree. Limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 ran from enforceability, and a dismissed review did not attract merger so as to suspend that period. In the absence of an express stay operating against the possession decree, the execution petition was barred by limitation. The SC set aside the judgment below and held the execution petition time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294087