<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 840 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294086</link>
    <description>The review application concerning a contract bid condition was dismissed due to a 42-day delay in filing and lack of grounds for an affirmative order. The court highlighted the absence of a legally enforceable right for bidders to compel bid acceptance, noting lapses in the tender submission by the applicants. Allegations of illegality in the tender process were raised, but the court found no basis for intervention, ultimately dismissing the review application without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 840 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294086</link>
      <description>The review application concerning a contract bid condition was dismissed due to a 42-day delay in filing and lack of grounds for an affirmative order. The court highlighted the absence of a legally enforceable right for bidders to compel bid acceptance, noting lapses in the tender submission by the applicants. Allegations of illegality in the tender process were raised, but the court found no basis for intervention, ultimately dismissing the review application without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>