https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405424 A retracted statement recorded under section 67 of the NDPS Act cannot, by itself, be treated as admissible confessional material for opposing bail, especially where no recovery is made from the accused's person or premises. The analysis further notes that section 37 restrictions do not automatically bar release when the prosecution case rests mainly on such a statement and a co-accused's version, without stronger incriminating material. On that basis, the bail petition was allowed, subject to bond, surety and other conditions. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:21:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405424 A retracted statement recorded under section 67 of the NDPS Act cannot, by itself, be treated as admissible confessional material for opposing bail, especially where no recovery is made from the accused's person or premises. The analysis further notes that section 37 restrictions do not automatically bar release when the prosecution case rests mainly on such a statement and a co-accused's version, without stronger incriminating material. On that basis, the bail petition was allowed, subject to bond, surety and other conditions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405424