<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 752 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405424</link>
    <description>The High Court granted bail to the petitioner based on the lack of direct incriminating evidence linking the petitioner to the contraband and the inadmissibility of the Section 67 statements as confessional evidence. The court emphasized the prosecution&#039;s obligation to prove its case on merits during the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 752 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405424</link>
      <description>The High Court granted bail to the petitioner based on the lack of direct incriminating evidence linking the petitioner to the contraband and the inadmissibility of the Section 67 statements as confessional evidence. The court emphasized the prosecution&#039;s obligation to prove its case on merits during the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>