<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 742 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405414</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent to release the consignment within two weeks. The court found that the extension notice was not timely or properly communicated, and the reasons for the extension were not provided as required by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 742 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405414</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondent to release the consignment within two weeks. The court found that the extension notice was not timely or properly communicated, and the reasons for the extension were not provided as required by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>