<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 730 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief as per law. The decision emphasized that the transaction value adopted by the appellant could not be rejected without concrete evidence of extra commercial consideration, and the demand was barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 730 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief as per law. The decision emphasized that the transaction value adopted by the appellant could not be rejected without concrete evidence of extra commercial consideration, and the demand was barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>