<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 726 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405398</link>
    <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus was available where imported goods were subsequently sold in the pre-GST period, even if no sales tax or VAT was actually collected and the applicable rate was nil. The authorities had wrongly relied on rescinded Notification No. 34/1998-Cus instead of the governing notification. The earlier tribunal view, supported by Circular No. 6/2008, confirmed that the condition of payment of appropriate sales tax or VAT is not defeated merely because the tax rate is nil. The appellant therefore satisfied the notification conditions and was entitled to SAD refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 726 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405398</link>
      <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus was available where imported goods were subsequently sold in the pre-GST period, even if no sales tax or VAT was actually collected and the applicable rate was nil. The authorities had wrongly relied on rescinded Notification No. 34/1998-Cus instead of the governing notification. The earlier tribunal view, supported by Circular No. 6/2008, confirmed that the condition of payment of appropriate sales tax or VAT is not defeated merely because the tax rate is nil. The appellant therefore satisfied the notification conditions and was entitled to SAD refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>