<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1427 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294077</link>
    <description>The Authority for Advance Ruling ruled that the applicant&#039;s request for an advance ruling on the GST rate for job work involving printing and coloring of textile fabrics was not admissible under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, as the issue had already been decided by the SGST authorities in Sikandrabad. The ruling was considered valid unless declared void under Section 104(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1427 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294077</link>
      <description>The Authority for Advance Ruling ruled that the applicant&#039;s request for an advance ruling on the GST rate for job work involving printing and coloring of textile fabrics was not admissible under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, as the issue had already been decided by the SGST authorities in Sikandrabad. The ruling was considered valid unless declared void under Section 104(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>