<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Refund Claims: Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Inapplicable to Public Sector; Proof of Duty Incidence Required.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57216</link>
    <description>Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - the proof that, the incidence of duty has not been passed on - State represents the people of the country. - No one can speak of the people being unjustly enriched - The doctrine of unjust enrichment is not applicable to the case of public sector undertakings - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:21:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:21:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Refund Claims: Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Inapplicable to Public Sector; Proof of Duty Incidence Required.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57216</link>
      <description>Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - the proof that, the incidence of duty has not been passed on - State represents the people of the country. - No one can speak of the people being unjustly enriched - The doctrine of unjust enrichment is not applicable to the case of public sector undertakings - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:21:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>