<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Allegations of Duty Evasion: Questioning Third-Party Document Validity in Clandestine Goods Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57208</link>
    <description>Clandestine production and removal - shortage of goods - duty evasion - The reliance of third party documents while conforming demand against present appellant is observed to be unjustified and unreasonable. Since the sole challenge to the order is its reliance upon third party evidence, it is necessary to check the evidentiary value of the third party evidence. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:02:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:02:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Allegations of Duty Evasion: Questioning Third-Party Document Validity in Clandestine Goods Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57208</link>
      <description>Clandestine production and removal - shortage of goods - duty evasion - The reliance of third party documents while conforming demand against present appellant is observed to be unjustified and unreasonable. Since the sole challenge to the order is its reliance upon third party evidence, it is necessary to check the evidentiary value of the third party evidence. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:02:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>