<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 708 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405380</link>
    <description>Services for preparing detailed project reports and providing project management consultancy under the PMAY arrangement were treated as activities linked to functions entrusted to Municipalities and Panchayats, because the work concerned housing, urban development, beneficiary verification, project monitoring, slum improvement and related municipal functions under Articles 243W and 243G. The ruling also treated these consultancy services as pure services, not works contract or composite supplies involving goods, and applied Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended, to hold that GST exemption is not denied merely because the services are routed through a main contractor and sub-contractor arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 708 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405380</link>
      <description>Services for preparing detailed project reports and providing project management consultancy under the PMAY arrangement were treated as activities linked to functions entrusted to Municipalities and Panchayats, because the work concerned housing, urban development, beneficiary verification, project monitoring, slum improvement and related municipal functions under Articles 243W and 243G. The ruling also treated these consultancy services as pure services, not works contract or composite supplies involving goods, and applied Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended, to hold that GST exemption is not denied merely because the services are routed through a main contractor and sub-contractor arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>