<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 695 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405367</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ appeal challenging the Customs &amp;amp; Excise Settlement Commission&#039;s order, emphasizing territorial jurisdiction. The court highlighted the importance of involving the jurisdictional Commissioner in settlement matters and referenced legal precedents to support its decision. The appellant was allowed to seek alternative remedies under the Act in the appropriate forum. The connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:33:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 695 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405367</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ appeal challenging the Customs &amp;amp; Excise Settlement Commission&#039;s order, emphasizing territorial jurisdiction. The court highlighted the importance of involving the jurisdictional Commissioner in settlement matters and referenced legal precedents to support its decision. The appellant was allowed to seek alternative remedies under the Act in the appropriate forum. The connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>