<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 29 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding interest charged by the assessee, upholding the claim of simple interest over compound interest based on the evidence presented. The Tribunal found that the document suggesting compound interest did not establish a presumption of compound interest, leading to the rejection of the application as the issue was considered a question of fact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:17:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 29 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding interest charged by the assessee, upholding the claim of simple interest over compound interest based on the evidence presented. The Tribunal found that the document suggesting compound interest did not establish a presumption of compound interest, leading to the rejection of the application as the issue was considered a question of fact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>