<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 679 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee held the flat since the allotment date, resulting in long-term capital gains. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer to examine the eligibility for deduction under Section 54 for reinvestment in another property. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 679 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee held the flat since the allotment date, resulting in long-term capital gains. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer to examine the eligibility for deduction under Section 54 for reinvestment in another property. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>