https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405349 The appellant successfully challenged a duty demand based on alleged duty evasion and clandestine removal of excisable goods. The court found insufficient evidence against the appellant, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal standards and requiring concrete evidence to support such allegations. The Order-in-Original was set aside, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. The judgment underscored the necessity of proper procedures and cogent evidence in cases involving duty evasion and clandestine activities. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405349 The appellant successfully challenged a duty demand based on alleged duty evasion and clandestine removal of excisable goods. The court found insufficient evidence against the appellant, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal standards and requiring concrete evidence to support such allegations. The Order-in-Original was set aside, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. The judgment underscored the necessity of proper procedures and cogent evidence in cases involving duty evasion and clandestine activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405349