<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 675 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to confirm the ad-hoc disallowance of trading purchases as non-genuine and directed the Assessing Officer to restrict additions based on the GP rate on disputed purchases. The Tribunal applied principles from a previous case to emphasize the importance of not rejecting purchases without affecting sales, allowing the appeals for statistical purposes for the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 675 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to confirm the ad-hoc disallowance of trading purchases as non-genuine and directed the Assessing Officer to restrict additions based on the GP rate on disputed purchases. The Tribunal applied principles from a previous case to emphasize the importance of not rejecting purchases without affecting sales, allowing the appeals for statistical purposes for the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>