<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 670 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act due to the mechanical approval by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. Other grounds raised by the Assessee, including the validity of deposits in the bank account and consideration of agricultural income and family savings, were not addressed as the reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 670 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act due to the mechanical approval by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. Other grounds raised by the Assessee, including the validity of deposits in the bank account and consideration of agricultural income and family savings, were not addressed as the reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>