<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 665 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405337</link>
    <description>An inadvertent clerical error in the shipping bill, where the reward column was marked &quot;N&quot; instead of &quot;Y,&quot; did not justify denial of NOC or rejection of MEIS benefit when the exporter&#039;s intention to claim the scheme was otherwise clear from the export documents and correspondence. The circular invoked by the authorities, which concerned conversion from one export promotion scheme to another, was held inapplicable on these facts. The cited precedents supported the principle that substantive export incentive cannot be denied solely because of a procedural mistake in shipping documentation. The denial of NOC and the MEIS claim was therefore unsustainable, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:32:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 665 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405337</link>
      <description>An inadvertent clerical error in the shipping bill, where the reward column was marked &quot;N&quot; instead of &quot;Y,&quot; did not justify denial of NOC or rejection of MEIS benefit when the exporter&#039;s intention to claim the scheme was otherwise clear from the export documents and correspondence. The circular invoked by the authorities, which concerned conversion from one export promotion scheme to another, was held inapplicable on these facts. The cited precedents supported the principle that substantive export incentive cannot be denied solely because of a procedural mistake in shipping documentation. The denial of NOC and the MEIS claim was therefore unsustainable, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>