https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405336 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant, a Non-Resident Indian, had satisfactorily explained the sources of funds for investments in residential properties. The additions made by the Assessing Officer under Sections 68 and 69 of the Income Tax Act were deemed unjustified. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned additions, ruling in favor of the appellant. en-us Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 May 2021 13:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405336 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant, a Non-Resident Indian, had satisfactorily explained the sources of funds for investments in residential properties. The additions made by the Assessing Officer under Sections 68 and 69 of the Income Tax Act were deemed unjustified. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned additions, ruling in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405336